Single-Wicket Cricket: Difference between revisions
Bsallardice (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Bsallardice (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<p>There is, in effect, a foul ground behind the wicket, so unlike full-team cricket, only balls hit forward are deemed to be in play.</p> | <p>There is, in effect, a foul ground behind the wicket, so unlike full-team cricket, only balls hit forward are deemed to be in play.</p> | ||
<p>As late at 1969 there were annual single-wicket championships at Lord’s in London. In the very early years, most cricket is believed to use a single wicket, and each references to cricket in the US usually reported very small numbers of players. Early cricket rules called for single-wicket play when team sizes were five or fewer.</p> | <p>As late at 1969 there were annual single-wicket championships at Lord’s in London. In the very early years, most cricket is believed to use a single wicket, and each references to cricket in the US usually reported very small numbers of players. Early cricket rules called for single-wicket play when team sizes were five or fewer.</p> | ||
<p>The Sunbury <em>Gazette</em>, Sept. 3, 1859 reprints an essay on cricket from the <em>North American</em>, and labels single-wicket a predecessor game to cricket.</p> | |||
|Sources= | |Sources= | ||
|Source Image= | |Source Image= | ||
|Comment=<p>The single-wicket game was often played in the U.S. See Chronologies 1845.23 and 1864.46.</p> | |Comment=<p>The single-wicket game was often played in the U.S. See Chronologies 1845.23 and 1864.46. See also New York Herald, Sept. 12, 1844; Oct. 25, Nov. 4, 1845; May 16, 1846; Oct. 5, 1847; New York Times, May 9, 1855; Sunbury Gazette, July 30, 1859; Milwaukee Daily Free Democrat, Oct. 6, 1852. These games involved anywhere from 1 to 8 players a side.</p> | ||
|Query= | |Query= | ||
|Has Supplemental Text=No | |Has Supplemental Text=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 05:39, 5 June 2022
| Game | Single-Wicket Cricket |
|---|---|
| Game Family | Baseball |
| Location | |
| Regions | Britain, US |
| Eras | 1700s, 1800s, Post-1900, Predecessor |
| Invented | No |
| Tags | |
| Description | Single-wicket cricket uses teams smaller than the usual 11-player teams. All bowling is to a single wicket. There is, in effect, a foul ground behind the wicket, so unlike full-team cricket, only balls hit forward are deemed to be in play. As late at 1969 there were annual single-wicket championships at Lord’s in London. In the very early years, most cricket is believed to use a single wicket, and each references to cricket in the US usually reported very small numbers of players. Early cricket rules called for single-wicket play when team sizes were five or fewer. The Sunbury Gazette, Sept. 3, 1859 reprints an essay on cricket from the North American, and labels single-wicket a predecessor game to cricket. |
| Sources | |
| Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
| Comment | The single-wicket game was often played in the U.S. See Chronologies 1845.23 and 1864.46. See also New York Herald, Sept. 12, 1844; Oct. 25, Nov. 4, 1845; May 16, 1846; Oct. 5, 1847; New York Times, May 9, 1855; Sunbury Gazette, July 30, 1859; Milwaukee Daily Free Democrat, Oct. 6, 1852. These games involved anywhere from 1 to 8 players a side. Edit with form to add a comment |
| Query | Edit with form to add a query |
| Has Supplemental Text |
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />