1860.54: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add Year Number) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Chronology Entry | {{Chronology Entry | ||
|Year=1860 | |||
|Year Number=54 | |||
|Headline=Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket? | |Headline=Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket? | ||
|Salience=2 | |Salience=2 | ||
|Country=US | |||
|Game=Cricket | |Game=Cricket | ||
|Text=<p>"Whenever the cricket community realized that American participation and interest were low, they talked about changing the rules. | |Text=<p>"Whenever the cricket community realized that American participation and interest were low, they talked about changing the rules. Some Americans suggested three outs per inning and six innings a game."</p> | ||
<p>William Ryczek, < | <p> </p> | ||
|Sources=<p>William Ryczek, <span>Baseball's First Inning</span> (McFarland, 2009), page 103. Attributed to the Chadwick Scrapbooks. </p> | |||
|Query=<p>Were there really several such proposals? Can we guess what impediments required that it take another century to invent one-day and 20/20 cricket?</p> | |||
|Reviewed=Yes | |Reviewed=Yes | ||
| | |Has Supplemental Text=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 25 November 2013
 |
| Prominent Milestones |
| Misc BB Firsts |
| Add a Misc BB First |
| About the Chronology |
| Tom Altherr Dedication |
| Add a Chronology Entry |
| Open Queries |
| Open Numbers |
| Most Aged |
Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket?
| Salience | Noteworthy |
|---|---|
| Tags | |
| Location | |
| City/State/Country: | US |
| Modern Address | |
| Game | CricketCricket |
| Immediacy of Report | |
| Age of Players | |
| Holiday | |
| Notables | |
| Text | "Whenever the cricket community realized that American participation and interest were low, they talked about changing the rules. Some Americans suggested three outs per inning and six innings a game."
|
| Sources | William Ryczek, Baseball's First Inning (McFarland, 2009), page 103. Attributed to the Chadwick Scrapbooks. |
| Warning | |
| Comment | Edit with form to add a comment |
| Query | Were there really several such proposals? Can we guess what impediments required that it take another century to invent one-day and 20/20 cricket? Edit with form to add a query |
| Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
| External Number | |
| Submitted by | |
| Submission Note | |
| Has Supplemental Text |
1860.54 Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket?"
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />