1860.54: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Chronology Import) |
(Convert Is in Main Chronology to Salience) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Headline=Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket? | |Headline=Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket? | ||
|Year=1860 | |Year=1860 | ||
| | |Salience=2 | ||
|Game=Cricket | |Game=Cricket | ||
|Text=<p>"Whenever the cricket community realized that American participation and interest were low, they talked about changing the rules. Some Americans suggested three outs per inning and six innings a game."</p> | |Text=<p>"Whenever the cricket community realized that American participation and interest were low, they talked about changing the rules. Some Americans suggested three outs per inning and six innings a game."</p> | ||
<p>William Ryczek, <u>Baseball's First Inning</u> (McFarland, 2009), page 103. Attributed to the Chadwick Scrapbooks. <b>Query:</b> Were there really several such proposals? Can we guess what impediments required that it take another century to invent one-day and 20/20 cricket?</p> | <p>William Ryczek, <u>Baseball's First Inning</u> (McFarland, 2009), page 103. Attributed to the Chadwick Scrapbooks. <b>Query:</b> Were there really several such proposals? Can we guess what impediments required that it take another century to invent one-day and 20/20 cricket?</p> | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 11:26, 3 August 2012
Prominent Milestones |
Misc BB Firsts |
Add a Misc BB First |
About the Chronology |
Tom Altherr Dedication |
Add a Chronology Entry |
Open Queries |
Open Numbers |
Most Aged |
This record has been submitted recently, and has not yet been reviewed. This does not imply that the information is incorrect, but that it is not yet included in official datasets. This notice will no longer appear once the record has been reviewed.
Approve
Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket?
Salience | Noteworthy |
---|---|
Tags | |
Location | |
City/State/Country: | [[{{{Country}}}]] |
Modern Address | |
Game | CricketCricket |
Immediacy of Report | |
Age of Players | |
Holiday | |
Notables | |
Text | "Whenever the cricket community realized that American participation and interest were low, they talked about changing the rules. Some Americans suggested three outs per inning and six innings a game." William Ryczek, Baseball's First Inning (McFarland, 2009), page 103. Attributed to the Chadwick Scrapbooks. Query: Were there really several such proposals? Can we guess what impediments required that it take another century to invent one-day and 20/20 cricket? |
Sources | |
Warning | |
Comment | Edit with form to add a comment |
Query | Edit with form to add a query |
Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
External Number | |
Submitted by | |
Submission Note | |
Has Supplemental Text |
1860. Yes, The Game Would Move Right Along . . . But Would it be Cricket?"
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />