1841.10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add Year Number) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Chronology Entry | {{Chronology Entry | ||
|Year=1841 | |||
|Year Suffix= | |||
|Year Number=10 | |||
|Headline=Bloomfield CT Wicket Challenge: "One Shamble Shall Be Out" | |Headline=Bloomfield CT Wicket Challenge: "One Shamble Shall Be Out" | ||
|Salience=2 | |Salience=2 | ||
|Location= | |||
|Country= | |||
|Coordinates= | |||
|State= | |||
|City= | |||
|Modern Address= | |||
|Game=Wicket | |Game=Wicket | ||
|Text=<p>"The Ball Players of Bloomfield and vicinity, respectfully invite the Pall Players of the city of Hartford to . . . play at Wicket Ball, the best in nine games for Dinner and Trimmings. | |Immediacy of Report= | ||
<p>< | |Holiday= | ||
|Notables= | |||
|Text=<p>"The Ball Players of Bloomfield and vicinity, respectfully invite the Pall Players of the city of Hartford to . . . play at Wicket Ball, the best in nine games for Dinner and Trimmings. The Rules to be as follows: [1] The ball to be rolled and to strike the once or more before it reaches the wicket. [2] The ball to be fairly caught flying or at the first bound. [3] The striker may defend his wicket with his bat as he may choose. [4] One shamble shall be out. [5] Each party may choose one judge or talisman."</p> | |||
<p><strong> </strong></p> | |||
|Sources=<p><em>Hartford Daily Courant</em>, June 23, 1841, page 3. </p> | |||
|Warning= | |||
|Comment=<p>Years ago, we had asked here: "Is the bound rule [2] usual in wicket? What is rule 3 getting at? What is rule 4 getting at?"</p> | |||
<p>On 3/4/2022 Alex Dubois offered these clarifications:</p> | |||
<p>"The bound rule [2] is indeed unusual compared to other rulesets, which almost always specify “flying balls only are out.” I still don’t understand rule [3], which shows up occasionally; the New Britain rules say that a batter may only strike the ball with his bat once, except “in defense of his wicket”; still trying to figure out what that means as an exception to the one-hit statement. Rule [4] regarding shambles I think is similar to the “shams” rule from the Litchfield Club. This occurs if the ball strikes any other part of the batsman/striker before the bat (i.e. kicked, hit with hand, elbow, etc.). Litchfield allowed for three shams=out, but maybe Bloomfield only had one shamble=out.</p> | |||
<p><em>2022 Speculation:</em> perhaps the "one swing" rule was meant to prevent batsmen from taking a second hack at a badly-struck ball, which might injure a fielder? We wonder if English cricket includes a rule on repeat swings. Is a "shamble" something like a leg before wicket infraction in cricket?</p> | |||
<p> </p> | |||
|Query=<p> </p> | |||
<p><strong> </strong></p> | |||
|Source Image= | |||
|External Number= | |||
|Submitted by= | |||
|Submission Note= | |||
|Reviewed=Yes | |Reviewed=Yes | ||
| | |Has Supplemental Text=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:40, 4 March 2022
 |
| Prominent Milestones |
| Misc BB Firsts |
| Add a Misc BB First |
| About the Chronology |
| Tom Altherr Dedication |
| Add a Chronology Entry |
| Open Queries |
| Open Numbers |
| Most Aged |
Bloomfield CT Wicket Challenge: "One Shamble Shall Be Out"
| Salience | Noteworthy |
|---|---|
| Tags | |
| Location | |
| City/State/Country: | [[]] |
| Modern Address | |
| Game | WicketWicket |
| Immediacy of Report | |
| Age of Players | |
| Holiday | |
| Notables | |
| Text | "The Ball Players of Bloomfield and vicinity, respectfully invite the Pall Players of the city of Hartford to . . . play at Wicket Ball, the best in nine games for Dinner and Trimmings. The Rules to be as follows: [1] The ball to be rolled and to strike the once or more before it reaches the wicket. [2] The ball to be fairly caught flying or at the first bound. [3] The striker may defend his wicket with his bat as he may choose. [4] One shamble shall be out. [5] Each party may choose one judge or talisman."
|
| Sources | Hartford Daily Courant, June 23, 1841, page 3. |
| Warning | |
| Comment | Years ago, we had asked here: "Is the bound rule [2] usual in wicket? What is rule 3 getting at? What is rule 4 getting at?" On 3/4/2022 Alex Dubois offered these clarifications: "The bound rule [2] is indeed unusual compared to other rulesets, which almost always specify “flying balls only are out.” I still don’t understand rule [3], which shows up occasionally; the New Britain rules say that a batter may only strike the ball with his bat once, except “in defense of his wicket”; still trying to figure out what that means as an exception to the one-hit statement. Rule [4] regarding shambles I think is similar to the “shams” rule from the Litchfield Club. This occurs if the ball strikes any other part of the batsman/striker before the bat (i.e. kicked, hit with hand, elbow, etc.). Litchfield allowed for three shams=out, but maybe Bloomfield only had one shamble=out. 2022 Speculation: perhaps the "one swing" rule was meant to prevent batsmen from taking a second hack at a badly-struck ball, which might injure a fielder? We wonder if English cricket includes a rule on repeat swings. Is a "shamble" something like a leg before wicket infraction in cricket? Edit with form to add a comment |
| Query |
Edit with form to add a query |
| Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
| External Number | |
| Submitted by | |
| Submission Note | |
| Has Supplemental Text |
1841.10 Bloomfield CT Wicket Challenge: "One Shamble Shall Be Out""
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />