1822.2: Difference between revisions

From Protoball
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Chronology Import)
 
(Convert Is in Main Chronology to Salience)
Line 2: Line 2:
|Headline=Round-Arm Bowling Disallowed at Lord's Cricket Ground
|Headline=Round-Arm Bowling Disallowed at Lord's Cricket Ground
|Year=1822
|Year=1822
|Is in main chronology=yes
|Salience=2
|Text=<p>Ford reports that "John Willes of Kent is "no-balled" for "throwing" at Lord's for round-arm bowling.  Nevertheless William Lillywhite James Broadbridge and others continue this practice.  John Ford, <u>Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835</u> [David and Charles, 1972], page 21.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.</p>
|Text=<p>Ford reports that "John Willes of Kent is "no-balled" for "throwing" at Lord's for round-arm bowling.  Nevertheless William Lillywhite James Broadbridge and others continue this practice.  John Ford, <u>Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835</u> [David and Charles, 1972], page 21.  Ford does not give a citation for this account.</p>
}}
}}

Revision as of 10:55, 3 August 2012

Chronologies
Scroll.png

Prominent Milestones

Misc BB Firsts
Add a Misc BB First

About the Chronology
Tom Altherr Dedication

Add a Chronology Entry
Open Queries
Open Numbers
Most Aged

Round-Arm Bowling Disallowed at Lord's Cricket Ground

Salience Noteworthy
Text

Ford reports that "John Willes of Kent is "no-balled" for "throwing" at Lord's for round-arm bowling. Nevertheless William Lillywhite James Broadbridge and others continue this practice. John Ford, Cricket: A Social History 1700-1835 [David and Charles, 1972], page 21. Ford does not give a citation for this account.

Comment Edit with form to add a comment
Query Edit with form to add a query



Comments

<comments voting="Plus" />