1550c.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add Year Number) |
|
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 10:24, 7 September 2022
Prominent Milestones |
Misc BB Firsts |
Add a Misc BB First |
About the Chronology |
Tom Altherr Dedication |
Add a Chronology Entry |
Open Queries |
Open Numbers |
Most Aged |
No English Reference Claimed for the Word "Cricket" Found Before 1550
Salience | Noteworthy |
---|---|
Tags | |
Location | |
City/State/Country: | [[{{{Country}}}]] |
Modern Address | |
Game | |
Immediacy of Report | |
Age of Players | |
Holiday | |
Notables | |
Text | "The medieval origin of the national game of the English is beyond doubt, but not so its Island roots. There would have been ample opportunity for it to figure on the lists of banned games set out by their kings, but there is no written mention of it before 1550. It is, of course, not impossible that its forerunner was one of the many ball games played with unidentifiable rules, as for instance club ball." From an unidentified photocopy in the "Origins of Baseball" file at the Giamatti Center at Cooperstown. Note: the inconsistencies among the preceding cricket entries [see #1478.1,] need to be resolved . . . . or at least addressed. |
Sources | |
Warning | |
Comment | Edit with form to add a comment |
Query | Edit with form to add a query |
Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
External Number | |
Submitted by | |
Submission Note | |
Has Supplemental Text |
1550.1 No English Reference Claimed for the Word "Cricket" Found Before 1550"
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />