1828.1: Difference between revisions

From Protoball
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 26: Line 26:
<p>.</p>
<p>.</p>
|Warning=
|Warning=
|Comment=<p>David Block, <span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baseball Before We Knew It</span>,&nbsp;</span>page 192-193, describes the wide popularity of this text in England and the US, running through many editions through the 1880s, and also identifies this book as Robert Henderson's key evidence in his refutation of the Doubleday theory of baseball's origins 11 years later</p>
|Comment=<p>[] David Block, <span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baseball Before We Knew It</span>,&nbsp;</span>page 192-193, describes the wide popularity of this text in England and the US, running through many editions through the 1880s, and also identifies this book as Robert Henderson's key evidence in his refutation of the Doubleday theory of baseball's origins 11 years later.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[] In 2021 Protoball asked David Block why the&nbsp;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Boy's Own Book</span>&nbsp;had not mentioned English base ball among ballplaying versions as late as 1828:</p>
<p>"English Baseball was omitted because it was an under-the-radar game even back then. It was largely unknown in London and thus largely unknown to Clark and, apparently, to anyone else who may have helped him write The Boy&rsquo;s Own Book."</p>
<p>(Email from David Block, 9/21/21)</p>
|Query=
|Query=
|Source Image=
|Source Image=

Latest revision as of 08:37, 22 September 2021

Chronologies
Scroll.png

Prominent Milestones

Misc BB Firsts
Add a Misc BB First

About the Chronology
Tom Altherr Dedication

Add a Chronology Entry
Open Queries
Open Numbers
Most Aged

Boy's Own Book [London] Describes "Rounders," Stoolball, Feeder

Salience Noteworthy
Tags Pre-modern Rules
Game Rounders, Stool-ball, Northern Spell, Feeder
Age of Players Youth
Text

The Boy's Own Book is published in London and contains a set of rules for "stool-ball," [p. 26], "trap, bat, and ball," [p. 27], "northern-spell," [p. 28], "rounders," [p.28], and "feeder" [p. 29]. The rounders entry states: "this is a favorite game with bat and ball, especially in the west of England." The entry for feeder, in its entirety: "This game is played with three bases only, and a player takes the place of feeder, who remains so until he puts one of the other players out, by catching his ball or striking him while running from base to base, as at Rounders; the one who is put out taking the place of feeder to the others, and thus the game goes on. There are no sides at this game." The entry for northern spell describes a game without running or fielding, in which the object is to hit the ball farthest - "this pastime possesses but little variety, and is by no means so amusing to the bystanders as Trapball."

 Altherr uses a reference to an 1829 US version: The Boy's Own Book [Munroe and Francis, Boston, 1829], pp. 18-19, per Thomas L. Altherr, "A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball," reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, ref # 65. David Block, page 192-193, describes the wide popularity of this text in England and the US, running through many editions through the 1880s, and also identifies this book as Henderson's key evidence in his refutation of the Doubleday theory of baseball's origin 11 years later.

 

Sources

 

Clarke, W., Boy's Own Book (London, Vizetelly Branston), 1828: second edition. This book is reportedly still available (Appleton Books, 1996), according to Tim Wiles at the Giamatti Research Library. Note: 

Tom Altherr uses a reference to an 1829 US version: The Boy's Own Book (Munroe and Francis, Boston, 1829), pp. 18-19, per Thomas L. Altherr, "A Place Leavel Enough to Play Ball," reprinted in David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, (Nebraska, 2005), pp. 229ff. 

 

.

Comment

[] David Block, Baseball Before We Knew Itpage 192-193, describes the wide popularity of this text in England and the US, running through many editions through the 1880s, and also identifies this book as Robert Henderson's key evidence in his refutation of the Doubleday theory of baseball's origins 11 years later.

 

[] In 2021 Protoball asked David Block why the Boy's Own Book had not mentioned English base ball among ballplaying versions as late as 1828:

"English Baseball was omitted because it was an under-the-radar game even back then. It was largely unknown in London and thus largely unknown to Clark and, apparently, to anyone else who may have helped him write The Boy’s Own Book."

(Email from David Block, 9/21/21)

Edit with form to add a comment
Query Edit with form to add a query



Comments

<comments voting="Plus" />