1862.44: Difference between revisions
(Add review flag) |
(Add Year Number) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|External Number=32 | |External Number=32 | ||
|Reviewed=Yes | |Reviewed=Yes | ||
|Year Number=44 | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 17:08, 6 September 2012
Prominent Milestones |
Misc BB Firsts |
Add a Misc BB First |
About the Chronology |
Tom Altherr Dedication |
Add a Chronology Entry |
Open Queries |
Open Numbers |
Most Aged |
Ohio Soldier Sees “Most of Our Company “ Playing Pre-battle Bat Ball
Salience | Peripheral |
---|---|
Tags | Civil WarCivil War |
Location | |
City/State/Country: | [[{{{Country}}}]] |
Modern Address | |
Game | |
Immediacy of Report | |
Age of Players | |
Holiday | |
Notables | |
Text | “The report of musketry is heard but a very little distance from us . . . yet on the other side of the road is most of our company, playing Bat Ball and perhaps in less than half an hour, they may be called to play a Ball game of a more serious nature.” Attributed to “an Ohio private” who wrote home from Virginia in 1862, in Ward and Burns, Baseball: An Illustrated History (Knopf, 1994), page 13. No source is given. Note: can we find the original source and fill in some detail? Note: the private’s use of the term “bat ball” is unusual. “Bat ball” is found in much earlier times [it was banned in both Pittsfield and Northampton MA in 1791]. In this case, since the private is an observer, not a player, it may be that he is using an incorrect label for the game he observes in 1862. Still, it may possibly imply that the term “bat ball” was current in Ohio in the pre-war years (in the private’s youth?), if not later. |
Sources | |
Warning | |
Comment | Edit with form to add a comment |
Query | Edit with form to add a query |
Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
External Number | 32 |
Submitted by | |
Submission Note | |
Has Supplemental Text |
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />