1683c.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add review flag) |
(Add Year Number) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<p><b>Note:</b> We should locate Nyren's original claim. Does this imply that cricket was played without wickets, or without bails, before 1683?</p> | <p><b>Note:</b> We should locate Nyren's original claim. Does this imply that cricket was played without wickets, or without bails, before 1683?</p> | ||
|Reviewed=Yes | |Reviewed=Yes | ||
|Year Number=1 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:28, 6 September 2012
 |
| Prominent Milestones |
| Misc BB Firsts |
| Add a Misc BB First |
| About the Chronology |
| Tom Altherr Dedication |
| Add a Chronology Entry |
| Open Queries |
| Open Numbers |
| Most Aged |
Cricket's First Wicket is Pitched
| Salience | Noteworthy |
|---|---|
| Tags | |
| Location | |
| City/State/Country: | [[{{{Country}}}]] |
| Modern Address | |
| Game | |
| Immediacy of Report | |
| Age of Players | |
| Holiday | |
| Notables | |
| Text | "We know that the first wicket, comprising two stumps with a bail across them, was pitched somewhere about 1683, as John Nyren recalled long afterward." Thomas Moult, "The Story of the Game," in Thomas Moult, ed., Bat and Ball: A New Book of Cricket (The Sportsmans Book Club, London, 1960: reprint from 1935), page 31. Note: We should locate Nyren's original claim. Does this imply that cricket was played without wickets, or without bails, before 1683? |
| Sources | |
| Warning | |
| Comment | Edit with form to add a comment |
| Query | Edit with form to add a query |
| Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
| External Number | |
| Submitted by | |
| Submission Note | |
| Has Supplemental Text |
1683c.1 Cricket's First Wicket is Pitched"
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />